Who is allowed to perform PRP treatment?
Physicians, dentists, naturopathic practitioners (Heilpraktiker), beauticians or medical practice staff: with PRP, the decisive question is not only who performs the injection. Blood collection, preparation, application and professional responsibility must be assessed separately.
Professional group check
Choose a professional group – blood collection, preparation and application are assessed separately.
Licensed physicians may perform PRP subject to the applicable professional and legal requirements.
- 01Blood collectionSection 7(2) TFG: by a physician or qualified staff under a physician’s responsibility.
- 02PreparationFor patient-specific preparation under the physician’s immediate personal professional responsibility, section 13(2b) AMG will generally apply; the activity must be notified under section 67 AMG.
- 03ApplicationThere is no special “PRP licence”. Actual competence, indication, professional rules, hygiene and safe organisation are decisive.
Dental treatment has its own exception under section 28 TFG, but only within the narrow statutory conditions.
- 01Blood collectionSection 28 TFG excludes the collection of a small amount of autologous blood for products intended for dental treatment from the scope of the TFG when its statutory conditions are met.
- 02PreparationPreparation and application must take place in the dental practice in accordance with the established recognised dental scientific and technical standard; section 67 AMG must still be considered.
- 03ApplicationA genuine link to dental treatment is required. This does not create a general authority to use PRP on the scalp, skin or other non-dental body areas.
Dermatologists and orthopaedists are licensed physicians. Their speciality is neither a separate PRP permit nor an automatic exclusive right.
- 01Blood collectionAs for other licensed physicians.
- 02PreparationAs for other licensed physicians, including the applicable notification and organisational duties.
- 03ApplicationThe specialist title alone is not decisive. What matters are actual competence, the treatment situation and the applicable professional rules.
An independent PRP service fails in particular because blood collection is subject to the physician reservation.
- 01Blood collectionIn 2024, the Bavarian Higher Administrative Court expressly held that PRP plasma autologous blood therapy falls under the physician reservation in section 7(2) TFG.
- 02PreparationPRP as a human blood preparation for medicinal use is prescription-only. The permit-free route in section 13(2b) AMG does not apply to non-physicians/non-dentists for prescription medicines.
- 03ApplicationA theoretically available manufacturing authorisation would not remove the preceding physician reservation for blood collection.
A beauty salon cannot provide a genuine PRP treatment as its own cosmetic standard service.
- 01Blood collectionSection 7(2) TFG places blood collection for these autologous blood products under medical responsibility.
- 02PreparationA course or device certificate does not create pharmaceutical manufacturing authority.
- 03ApplicationInvasive medical treatment is not covered by cosmetic training. This does not create an independent right to offer PRP treatment.
Qualified non-medical staff may perform individual tasks, but this does not create an independent PRP service.
- 01Blood collectionSection 7(2) TFG permits collection by qualified staff under the responsibility of a physician.
- 02PreparationPatient-specific preparation must be organised under the immediate professional responsibility required by law.
- 03ApplicationWhether a PRP injection may be delegated in an individual case cannot be answered in blanket terms. Indication, informed consent and overall responsibility require medical assessment.
The short answer
Professional title alone does not answer the question. At least four levels must align for PRP: who may collect the blood, who may prepare the autologous blood product, who may perform the specific invasive treatment, and who bears professional responsibility. That is why sweeping claims such as “only dermatologists may perform PRP” or “a course is enough for a Heilpraktiker” are not legally reliable.
| Professional group | Independent PRP service? | Assessment |
|---|---|---|
| Licensed physicians | Generally yes | With sufficient competence for the specific procedure and subject to all other statutory, professional and organisational requirements. |
| Dermatologists / orthopaedists | Generally yes | As licensed physicians; speciality is relevant to competence but is not a separate PRP licence. |
| Dentists | Yes, limited to dental treatment | Specific exception under section 28 TFG for small amounts of autologous blood for dental treatment, subject to its conditions. |
| Heilpraktiker | In practice, no | The blood-collection step is subject to the physician reservation; pharmaceutical manufacturing requirements apply in addition. |
| Beauticians | No | No independent authority for blood collection, preparation and invasive PRP treatment. |
| Medical assistants / practice staff | No, delegated only | Individual qualification-dependent tasks may be possible under medical responsibility. |
Four legal levels matter – not just the injection
Blood collection – TFG
Section 7(2) TFG is the central barrier. A donation may generally be collected only by a physician or qualified staff under a physician’s responsibility. Section 28 TFG contains a narrowly defined special exception for dentistry.
Preparation – AMG
Processing autologous blood into PRP is relevant under medicinal-products law. Section 13(2b) AMG may make a manufacturing authorisation unnecessary; section 67 AMG separately imposes a notification duty.
Application – professional law
A medical licence or another permission to practise medicine does not automatically resolve every PRP scenario. Actual competence, indication, informed consent and applicable professional law remain decisive.
System & hygiene
CE marking of a PRP system is not a treatment permit. Intended purpose, instructions for use, hygiene, documentation and traceability must be complied with separately.
May physicians perform PRP?
Generally, yes. There is no special state-issued “PRP licence”. Medical licensure is the professional-law basis, but it does not replace competence for the specific procedure. The physician must be able to manage the indication, blood collection, preparation, injection technique, informed consent and complications competently.
Speciality boundaries should neither be overstated nor ignored. The Federal Constitutional Court has not generally prohibited private medical activity outside a recognised speciality; this does not amount to blanket permission for any procedure. For PRP, the decisive factors should therefore be demonstrable competence in the specific procedure and the applicable professional rules of the federal state.
Accordingly, “only dermatologists may perform scalp PRP” is just as sweeping as “every licensed physician may perform every PRP injection”. The defensible position lies between these extremes: licensure is the foundation; actual competence is the practical limit.
May dentists use PRP or PRF?
Yes – within dentistry and on a separate statutory basis. Section 28 TFG excludes the collection of a small amount of autologous blood for the manufacture of products for dental treatment from the scope of the TFG under specified conditions. Preparation and application must occur in the dental practice according to the established recognised standard of dental science and technology.
This reference standard is specified by the guideline of the German Dental Association (BZÄK), published in agreement with the Paul-Ehrlich-Institut. It expressly covers autologous blood products including PRP/PRGF and PRF, as well as collection, preparation, application, quality assurance, documentation and qualification.
Important: the law does not define “small amount” as a universal millilitre threshold. We therefore do not invent a volume limit. The exception is also tied to products for dental treatment and to preparation and application in the dental practice. It does not create general authority for PRP on skin, scalp or other non-dental areas.
May Heilpraktiker perform PRP?
As an independent PRP autologous-blood treatment, in practice no. The decisive issue is not the injection first, but the blood collection. In 2024, the Bavarian Higher Administrative Court expressly held that PRP plasma autologous blood therapy is subject to the physician reservation in section 7(2) TFG.
A second obstacle arises under medicinal-products law: human blood preparations for medicinal use are prescription-only. For prescription medicines, the permit-free manufacturing route in section 13(2b) AMG does not apply to persons who are neither physicians nor dentists. A manufacturing authorisation under section 13(1) AMG would theoretically be a different legal route, but it would not remove the physician reservation applying to the preceding blood collection.
May beauticians offer PRP?
Not as an independent PRP treatment. Cosmetic training, a PRP course or a manufacturer certificate replaces neither the physician reservation for blood collection nor the necessary medical and pharmaceutical authority.
Labels such as “Vampire Facial” or “PRP Facial” do not change the assessment if blood is actually collected, processed and then invasively applied. The real procedure, not its marketing name, is decisive.
May a medical assistant collect blood for PRP?
Blood collection can generally be delegated. Section 7(2) TFG permits collection by other qualified staff under the responsibility of a physician. Whether a particular staff member is sufficiently qualified must be assessed and organisationally safeguarded by the responsible practice.
This does not create independent authority to provide PRP. Additional requirements apply to preparation, indication, informed consent and application. General delegation rules should not be used to assume categorically that every PRP injection can be delegated to non-medical staff.
What a PRP practice should check organisationally
- Assess the notification requirement for permit-free medicinal-product preparation under section 67 AMG and complete the notification correctly before starting the activity.
- Define patient-specific preparation and clear responsibilities throughout the workflow.
- Document a standard operating procedure for blood collection, preparation/centrifugation and application.
- Observe the intended purpose and instructions for use of every medical device used; do not confuse CE marking with approval of a therapy.
- Implement hygiene requirements for punctures and injections and, where applicable, additional indication-specific standards.
- Organise informed consent, documentation of batches/materials and traceability in a verifiable manner.
- Check competence, emergency management and professional liability coverage for the specific application.
Questions patients can ask before a PRP treatment
- Who establishes the medical indication and who bears overall responsibility?
- What qualifications and experience does the treating person have for this exact procedure?
- Which PRP system is used and is it used within its intended purpose?
- How are blood collection, preparation and injection organised hygienically?
- What realistic chances, limitations, alternatives and risks are explained for the specific indication?
Frequently asked questions
Does a medical practice always need a manufacturing authorisation for PRP?
Not necessarily. Section 13(2b) AMG can remove the need for a manufacturing authorisation for patient-specific preparation under immediate personal professional responsibility. The notification duty under section 67 AMG is a separate requirement.
May only dermatologists or orthopaedists perform PRP?
No. These specialities do not hold an exclusive PRP licence. Other licensed physicians may also be eligible if they are competent for the specific procedure and comply with the applicable professional requirements.
May a dentist offer PRP for hair loss?
No general authority for scalp treatment follows from dental licensure or the section 28 TFG exception. The exception is tied to products for dental treatment.
May Heilpraktiker offer PRP after completing a training course?
Training does not remove the physician reservation for blood collection. PRP plasma autologous blood therapy was expressly assigned to that reservation by the Bavarian Higher Administrative Court in 2024.
Would a manufacturing authorisation solve the issue for a Heilpraktiker?
It would not remove the preceding physician reservation for blood collection. It therefore does not solve an independent PRP service in practice.
May beauticians offer a “Vampire Facial” using PRP?
Not independently if blood is actually collected, processed into PRP and applied invasively. The service name does not change the legal classification of the actual procedure.
May a medical assistant draw blood for PRP?
Section 7(2) TFG permits collection by qualified staff under the responsibility of a physician. This does not turn the overall treatment into an independent service of the medical assistant.
Is a CE-marked PRP kit automatically authorised for every PRP treatment?
No. CE marking concerns conformity of the medical device with its intended purpose. Professional authority, the specific indication, medicinal-products law and permissible advertising claims must be assessed separately.
Primary sources and further authorities
- TFG § 7 – Anforderungen zur Entnahme der Spende
- TFG § 28 – Ausnahmen vom Anwendungsbereich
- AMG § 13 – Herstellungserlaubnis
- AMG § 67 – Allgemeine Anzeigepflicht
- AMVV Anlage 1 – Blutzubereitungen humanen Ursprungs
- ZHG § 1 – Zahnheilkunde
- HeilprG § 1 – Ausübung der Heilkunde
- Bayerischer VGH, Beschluss 28.08.2024 – 20 BV 23.1807 / 20 BV 23.1808
- BVerfG, Beschluss 20.05.2026 – 1 BvR 2324/24
- BVerfG, Beschluss 01.02.2011 – 1 BvR 2383/10
- Bundeszahnärztekammer – Richtlinie zu Blutprodukten in der Zahnheilkunde
- Paul-Ehrlich-Institut – Bekanntmachung der BZÄK-Richtlinie im Bundesanzeiger
- KBV – Delegation ärztlicher Leistungen
- RKI/KRINKO – Hygiene bei Punktionen und Injektionen
- BfArM – Konformitätsbewertung von Medizinprodukten
This article reflects the legal and research status for Germany as of 15 August 2026. It provides general professional orientation and is not legal advice for a specific practice location, treatment workflow or PRP system. State professional rules, authority requirements and the manufacturer documentation of the system used may impose additional requirements.